Tags
Cecilia Bartoli, Jean Nouvel, KKL, Kool and the Gang, lake lucerne, Luzern, Nuclear Power Plant, Yo-Yo Ma
The KKL, whose full name is the Konzert und Kongresszentrum Luzern, is a conference & cultural centre in central Switzerland. It is one of the country’s architectural highlights, a distinctive landmark designed by Jean Nouvel which successfully blends into the surrounding alpine landscape of Lake Lucerne. Inside, there is an auditorium that has been so finely tuned for acoustics you can literally hear a pin drop on stage, even with a full house. The ambience at a recent Tori Amos concert I attended there was so magical that I went all fangurl about it on Facebook. Recently though, it was announced the 12-year-old building needs public funding to the tune of CHF 19 million for refurbishments, which inspired heavy criticism and even had some calling for it to be torn down.
A while back, a friend I’ll call Marge sent me a text message. Whether I would like to come on a behind-the-scenes tour of the KKL. She promised there would be free coffee and nussgipfel; I said I’d go anyway. Getting a chance to snoop around where I normally have no right to be is just my thing, and the thought of seeing where the likes of Cecila Bartoli, Yo-Yo Ma and Kool & the Gang have hurried from dressing room to stage made my geeky little heart beat a little faster.
The next day, Marge sent me an email:
On Mar 13, 2012, at 9:47 PM, Marge wrote: Hiya. Do you have Canadian and Swiss citizenship? Or just Swiss?
On 14 Mar, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Katrin wrote: Both, why?
On Mar 14, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Marge wrote: Have to submit list of participants with nationalities. Just getting it ready. :-)
On 14 Mar, 2012, at 1:03 PM, Katrin wrote: Ok… do you need my fingerprints too???
On Mar 14, 2012, at 1:14 PM, Marge wrote: Not yet, I’ll let you know
On 14 Mar, 2012, at 1:19 PM, Katrin wrote: Still wondering why they need that…
On Mar 14, 2012, at 7:56 PM, Marge wrote: At least you’re not Iranian. In the US, they wouldn’t even let you get close to a power plant.
Finally, the penny dropped.
The KKL, whose full name is the Kernkraftwerk Leibstadt, is a nuclear power plant about 35 km from Zurich which produces over nine billion kilowatt hours of power every year. The aftermath of last year’s earthquake in Japan and the resulting nuclear disaster in Fukushima has inspired the federal government to study dismantling Switzerland’s nuclear power programme and to suggest the KKL, along with the three other plants in the country, be torn down.
Marge’s husband works at the plant, which is how she got a group of us registered for a special tour that would include the reactor building, a rare thrill of potential danger in itself. And so I found myself recently donning a spiffy outfit that included a fluorescent orange T-shirt, bright yellow socks, a lime green jumpsuit and a light blue hardhat. This way, I wouldn’t be walking around in my own slightly irradiated clothes later in the day. The different colours make the 200 kg of laundry done by the plant every day easier to separate and, in line with the logic of the respectable Swiss, ensure no one steals a T-shirt. They obviously haven’t had much experience with North American visitors, because we all immediately tried to figure a way to smuggle them out as souvenirs and failing that, came up with a business plan for the gift shop. I would have loved to take a picture of us all looking so colourfully dorky, but then I’d probably be writing this from jail.
The tour started in an information centre open to the general public which reminded me of some of the set-ups found in the bunkers of James Bond movie villains – complete with nifty and colourful models of all kinds of potentially dangerous things.
Our guide was very charming and knowledgeable, taking us through the whole process of how the plant worked, from nuclear fission in the reactor core to the energy produced by the turbines heated by the resulting steam, and the cooling system connected to the huge tower – that oversized chimney usually associated with a nuclear power plant. In true Swiss fashion, she remained staunchly neutral on controversial subjects: describing what happens during a nuclear meltdown, she classified the resulting radioactive clump of fuel elements as “not nice”. She also rounded off an explanation of uranium enrichment with the delightful understatement that “for some countries (having weapons-grade uranium) is an advantage”. Indeed.
In every group there’s one know-it-all (we had at least two) and neither is any tour complete without the self-proclaimed humorist, who in this case immediately quipped, as we set off in our colourful gear, that we were all sure to get “that special glow”. On our way to the reactor building, we were shown three sizes of plastic bags and asked what we thought they were used for. The joker suggested they were “to dispose of shoes, clothes and the body”. That didn’t make our guide flinch – or laugh – either, so finally I shut up and let her get on with it (they were for maintenance).
Accessing the reactor building was like entering a space capsule; we went through an elaborate air lock system only a few people at time can use. That James Bond feeling was back. Once inside, the pool of crystal clear water covering the reactor itself had an amazing blue tinge, like Lake Louise in July. A “No lifeguard on duty” sign reassured me that I wasn’t the only wiseass on the compound.
Visiting the KKL was an imposing experience: it is an overwhelmingly complex, impressive machine, with an amazing amount of effort gone into technology, operation and plant safety – the reactor’s containment shield has been constructed to resist missiles and airplanes, for example. But still, there is an uneasy air to the place. “What’s that smell?” I asked as we all stood in the elevator on our way down to the fuel assembly storage facility. “Fear,” said Marge’s brother.
According to the World Nuclear Association, with all the nuclear power plants in the world, there have been only three major accidents – Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and Fukushima – in the cumulative 14,500 reactor-years of their existence. Those are excellent statistics, but still it can be hard to get beyond the fact that although the probability of a disaster is low, the consequences are high, with the waste from spent fuel rods needing to be stored for about a thousand years before radiation levels return to that of naturally-occurring uranium.
And that’s what it boils down to, as we try to reconcile our every-increasing need for energy with the fact that there is currently no more efficient way to produce it than a nuclear power station. 40% of Switzerland’s power is still generated by its four plants. Hydroelectric, fossil fuelled, wind, solar, and other alternatives are nowhere near as good at (or in some cases as clean as) producing the amount of kilowatt hours needed to heat my house, light my street and charge my pile of electronic toys. So I either have to get used to living with the risk of nuclear power, learn do with less energy or become smarter than I am and invent a better system.










































